PhishbitePerformance
Prototype · illustrativeGeneral overview of the company's cyber awareness, coverage of phishing test topics, and completed cyber awareness training courses.
Awareness Score signals
Based on 18 eligible employees · no combined organisation scoreTypical result across 18 eligible employees
25% of eligible employees score at or below this
3 eligible employees need more support
18 of 22 active employees have enough evidence
| Topic | Test sent to | Click rate | Email communication | Secondary actions | Learning completed | Report rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account security notifications | 22 | 14% | 0% | 18% | 100% | 0% |
| Attractive offers | 22 | 5% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 9% |
| Delivery and parcels | 21 | 10% | 5% | 5% | 86% | 14% |
| Internal IT requests | 20 | 20% | 0% | 10% | 90% | 25% |
| Invoices and payments | 19 | 11% | 5% | 5% | 95% | 21% |
| HR and benefits | 18 | 6% | 0% | 0% | 94% | 28% |
- 1
Pause before clicking unfamiliar links
Most common development area across recent simulations.
8 people
- 2
Report suspicious emails earlier
Before taking a risky action on the message.
5 people
- 3
Recognise credential capture pages
Repeated behaviour signal in the last 90 days.
3 people
Excellent is a temporary status placed on top of Good. Shown as its own segment when currently active.
5 employees improved their level in the last 90 days.
4 employees currently hold Excellent status.
Training-only employees are not included in the Awareness Score indicators.
Focus on the 8 employees who show this development theme. Keep participation private and review movement after the next simulation.
Prototype methodology is illustrative and unvalidated. No combined organisation score, no public employee ranking. Cross-group comparisons are only made when programme settings, exposure and simulation difficulty are reasonably similar.